Correction of undesirable pseudophakic refractive error with the Sulcoflex intraocular lens.

نویسندگان

  • Kevin Falzon
  • Owen G Stewart
چکیده

PURPOSE To evaluate the visual outcomes, efficacy, predictability, and short-term safety of implanting the Sulcoflex (Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd) intraocular lens (IOL) to correct residual pseudophakic errors. METHODS Retrospective study of patients undergoing implantation of the Sulcoflex IOL. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity and refractive outcomes were evaluated. Postoperative follow-up was at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS Fifteen eyes (13 patients) were evaluated. Mean follow-up was 20 months (range: 14 to 30 months). The Sulcoflex aspheric (653L) and toric (653T) IOLs were implanted in 3 and 12 eyes, respectively. Preoperatively, mean logMAR (Snellen) UDVA and CDVA were 0.44 (20/55) and 0.05 (20/22), respectively. At 3 months, all eyes achieved logMAR UDVA of 0.20 (20/32) or better, with 10 (67%) eyes achieving UDVA of 0 (20/20) or better. Preoperative mean spherical and astigmatic errors were 1.07±0.83 diopters (D) and -1.45±0.98 D, respectively. Preoperative mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.54±1.11 (D). Postoperative mean sphere and astigmatism at 3 months were -0.25±0.38 D and -0.50±0.57 D, respectively. Postoperative mean spherical equivalent refraction at 3 months was -0.15±0.28 D. All patients were within 1.00 D of attempted correction, with 93% within 0.50 D. Linear regression analysis showed good correlation (R²=0.72) between attempted versus achieved spherical equivalent refractions. No significant intra- or postoperative complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS Implantation of the Sulcoflex IOL was found to be an effective and predictable option for enhancing postoperative refractive results and reducing spectacle dependence for distance after surgery. The IOL was well tolerated in all eyes.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Piggyback intraocular lens implantation to correct pseudophakic refractive error after segmental multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE To evaluate refractive and visual outcomes of secondary piggyback intraocular lens implantation in patients diagnosed as having residual ametropia following segmental multifocal lens implantation. METHODS Data of 80 pseudophakic eyes with ametropia that underwent Sulcoflex aspheric 653L intraocular lens implantation (Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd., East Sussex, United Kingdom) to corr...

متن کامل

Enhancement of Refractive Results after Intraocular Lens Implantation

Summary: An overview on polypseudophakia (‘piggyback’ intraocular lens [IOLs]) is given. Requirements on a sulcus-supported supplementary IOL are defined. Two-year results of a new IOL (Sulcoflex®) are presented and indications for this IOL are defined. Methods: The IOL is especially designed for implantation into the ciliary sulcus in pseudophakic eyes (piggyback). It is a single-piece implant...

متن کامل

Managing residual refractive error after cataract surgery.

We present a review of keratorefractive and intraocular approaches to managing residual astigmatic and spherical refractive error after cataract surgery, including laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), arcuate keratotomy, intraocular lens (IOL) exchange, piggyback IOLs, and light-adjustable IOLs. Currently available literature suggests that laser vision correc...

متن کامل

Piggyback intraocular lens implantation.

The piggyback method of implanting two intraocular lenses in one eye has been successfully expanded to address pseudophakic refractive error in normal eyes and eyes that have undergone post-penetrating keratoplasty. Piggyback implantation has been combined with the use of newly available minus-power lenses to provide appropriate power for a cataract patient with keratoconus, as well as to corre...

متن کامل

Silicone-diffractive versus acrylic-refractive supplementary iols: visual performance and manual handling.

PURPOSE To compare visual outcome and manual handling of additional multifocal sulcus-fixated intraocular lenses (IOLs) of different materials and lens concepts. METHODS Visual outcomes after implantation of a monofocal IOL in the capsular bag followed by implantation of a sulcus-fixated multifocal IOL (MIOL) in patients with cataract were assessed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of refractive surgery

دوره 28 9  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012